By Linux News Desk | Article Rating: |
|
August 18, 2003 12:00 AM EDT | Reads: |
40,056 |
The US software company Aduva has announced its intention to release a tool to root out SCO code in the current Linux kernel and replace it.
What the vnu.net report says is that the Butler Group, a company of analysts, has suggested in a recent research note that it can only be a matter of time before SCO code is removed entirely from the Linux kernel. "Even if SCO's claims are proven to be true that the 2.4 kernel and later do contain Unix code," says the report, 'the kernel will be rewritten."
So is it true that vendors and users could easily recompile their Linux software to temporarily remove modules that may contain SCO copyrighted software, thus avoiding potential demands by SCO for royalty payments? Well, even if it is, the point is moot until such time as SCO Group goes on recordsating what exact Linux components lie at the hertb of its lawsuit against IBM.
SuSE's vice president of corporate communications, Joe Eckert, tells vnu.net that any offending code could be replaced "within weeks if not days." The report suggests that it's only a matter of time before SCO code is removed entirely from the Linux kernel.
"A new kernel will not be long in coming, and SCO can wave goodbye to its expected royalties," it concludes.
Published August 18, 2003 Reads 40,056
Copyright © 2003 Ulitzer, Inc. — All Rights Reserved.
Syndicated stories and blog feeds, all rights reserved by the author.
Related Links
More Stories By Linux News Desk
SYS-CON's Linux News Desk gathers stories, analysis, and information from around the Linux world and synthesizes them into an easy to digest format for IT/IS managers and other business decision-makers.
![]() |
Michael O'Brien 08/30/04 02:33:18 PM EDT | |||
I have a real problem with this article. It is written in a manner that says that there IS hidden SCO code in the Linux kernel, not that there might be. This is a very serious presumption, especially since SCO has shown NO proof, line-by-line, with specificity that there is any SCO copyrighted code in the Linux kernel, despite two court orders to do so. |
![]() |
Alistair 05/31/04 02:26:50 PM EDT | |||
Does SCO have Microsoft's backing in its effort to derail Linux? Just curious. |
![]() |
Ken Jennings 08/19/03 05:18:41 PM EDT | |||
If SCO feels entitled to charge money for something they distributed under the GPL, aren't the author's of the other GPL'd packages included in SCO's version of Linux entitled to void the GPL license for their packages and demand SCO remove their packages from its distro (under pain of court action)? A nice thought. I wonder if it is attainable. Imagine what kind of distro SCO would have without any GPL add-ons. Hmmmm. Maybe about 2K of kernel code. |
- Who Are The All-Time Heroes of i-Technology?
- Ulitzer Names the World's 30 Most Influential Cloud Computing Bloggers
- SYS-CON Events Announces iTVcon Internet TV Conference & Expo 2007
- Tips For Press Releases in Reputation Management from Industry Veteran Brandon Hopkins
- United Credit Consultants™ Is a Leader Nationally in the Business Credit Industry With Their Business Credit Solutions™ Program
- i-Technology Blog: Google Trends on Java, McNealy, AJAX, and SOA Give Pause For Thought
- High-Tech Public Relations and Alan Zeichick - Analyze This!
- Ulitzer’s Amazing First 30 Days in Public Beta
- Ulitzer to Give Drupal 6.0 Its Biggest Scalability Challenge Yet
- Ulitzer vs. Ning - a Quick Review